Ian Sinke

Archive for October, 2008

Really bad UI in Excel 2003

In Software, Technology on Friday, October 31, 2008 at 1:29 pm

Okay, so UI design isn’t the easiest thing in the world. Still, though, some parts of it are pretty consistent across applications, even across operating systems. Take, for example, the image below – a bunch of forward-back (or next-previous) buttons from different real applications.

Pretty simple, isn’t it? The forward button goes on the left. The back button goes on the right. They have nice icons pointing in the right direction. Now, look at the buttons in Excel 2003’s Print Preview window.

What? The Next button is on the left. The Previous button is on the right. Seriously, what were they thinking?

Recommended Listening #5

In Music, Recommended Listening on Monday, October 27, 2008 at 8:42 am

This week’s music:

Prelude in B Minor, Op.28, No.6, by Frederic Chopin.

I’m learning this piece right now for my Grade 8 exam, so I am, of course, biased. I do think it’s beautiful, though. I haven’t heard this particular recording yet (except for the preview on iTunes), but I really like the way this guy plays, so I think it’s a good choice.

Why Google owns the future of web mapping

In Internet, Technology on Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 6:38 pm

Half a decade ago, the big name in web maps was MapQuest. You wanted directions, you went to MapQuest. You wanted maps, maybe with satellite imagery? MapQuest was the only place to go. These days, though, every other mapping website lives in the shadow of one runaway success: Google Maps. And for good reasons, too: Google maps has better coverage, better browser support, a better interface, and much better satellite imagery.

And really, the satellite imagery is what a lot of people come for. Everyone knows it’s fun to look up your house, or for that matter, somebody else’s, and see what it looks like from space. (Usually, it looks like a roof. Not much, really. But bear with me.) Google’s satellite imagery is not only on average a lot newer than the competition’s (1-3 years old, compared to 2-3 years old on Live Maps and 4-5 years old on Yahoo Maps), it’s a lot clearer. And see that picture above? That was taken with a new high-image-quality satellite that Google has exclusive rights to the images from.

Google also leads, though, in map and directory coverage. Google has full maps of Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the United States, while Live Maps only has the United States, Canada, the UK, Germany, Italy, Australia, New Zealand, and India. And Live Maps doesn’t even cover the northern Canadian territories. Not that anybody cares, but still.

Google’s browser support is better (6 supported browsers vs. 3 or 4), and their mobile device support is outstanding. Google Maps is built into every one of the twelve million iPhones out there. They’re faster, easier, and a whole lot better looking than the competition. Plus, they have Street View. (Imagine how cool it would be to have street view, and turn-by-turn directions, on the iPhone.)

Sure, Live Maps has 3D features that Google Maps doesn’t. But they require a special browser plugin that’s slow to install and slow to use. You might as well download the free Google Earth, which provides a far better 3D experience. While Google might not have been the first to come up with webmail, GMail now outshines the competition by far; I think Google Maps will be doing the same thing before long.

Election 2008: The Website Review

In Internet on Monday, October 20, 2008 at 4:11 pm

Maybe you couldn’t care less who becomes the next president of the USA. Maybe you have a hard time deciding who to vote for. Maybe you’re a shallow moron who bases his voting decision on how good the candidate’s web site looks.

If you are, you’ve arrived at the right place. I carefully (read: carelessly) analyzed both ticket’s web sites to help you decide who you should vote for.

Design

Obama – The Obama-Biden web site is well designed, although slow. It received a makeover from its already-good design at the end of last year, and it looks even better now. It has well-thought-out menu navigation, pleasing fonts, and a great color scheme. The site promotes campaign action on your part and makes you want to help Obama win.

McCain – The McCain-Palin site looks good, but not nearly as good as the Obama site. In fact, at first glance, it appears to be a poor imitation of the former. It does have some advantages, though: nice animations on the home page, a photo gallery, etc. Its navigation menus, however, look awful when juxtaposed against Obama’s Also, the site doesn’t have that same energetic, glowing feel to it.

In short, Obama’s site is a lot like Obama, and McCain’s site is a lot like McCain.

Speed

When it comes to page load speeds, however, McCain has a real advantage. Although both sites employ a tacky sign-up landing page that needs to be circumnavigated to get to the real thing, McCain’s site loads considerably faster on the landing and home pages, although it lags a bit in the content pages, probably because YouTube videos take a long time to load.

Anyway, here are the numbers (which I timed with my wristwatch): Obama’s site took 50 seconds to load the landing page and 49 seconds to load the home page. His “About” page took 9 seconds to load. McCain’s site took 27 seconds to load the landing page and 11 seconds to load the home page; it, however, took 21 seconds to load the “About” page, although the page was semi-usable before it was fully loaded.

Conclusion

The presidential candidates’ web sites epitomize their characters: Obama’s is good-looking, but a bit slow, whereas McCain’s is a bit wrinkly, but more usable.

Your Opinion?

Recommended Listening #4

In Recommended Listening on Monday, October 20, 2008 at 8:14 am

This week’s music:

Moment Musical no.3 in F minor, by Franz Schubert

A plethora of different recordings are available on iTunes. There are basically two ways to play this piece, though: slow and sappy (like Horowitz does) or fast and hard.

The Recommended Reading feature is moving

In Internet, Miscellaneous, Recommended Reading on Saturday, October 4, 2008 at 12:13 pm

…to ma.gnolia.com.

In the past, I provided here, Saturdays, a list of my favorite blog posts and other online content from the week. It worked, I guess, but it was a pain to compile. So I finally decided I needed something new.

Ma.gnolia is a “social bookmarking” site, a lot like Delicious.com, but better looking. It allows you to bookmark sites, with rating, tags, and descriptions, and other people can subscribe to it. Hopefully this combination will be the perfect blend between full blog articles and little John Gruber-esque snippets that I’m looking for.

If you’d like to subscribe to my ma.gnolia feed (and I recommend that you do), it’s right here.

I’m on Flickr

In Internet, Miscellaneous on Friday, October 3, 2008 at 8:02 am

Been wanting to see my terrible photos? Now’s your chance: I’ve uploaded a bunch of my best (yes, that’s the best I can do) to flickr. Just head right on over to flickr.com/photos/iansinke to view my handiwork.

(You can also just click the link under the list of photos in the sidebar)

A Duo of Debates

In Miscellaneous on Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 6:02 pm

In an irritating coincidence, there are two debates I’d like to watch live tonight – the Canadian leaders’ debate and the Palin-Biden debate. The headline in today’s paper said it all:

Prime time toss-up: Canadians must choose tonight between watching homegrown election sparring or tuning in to Sarah Palin and the U.S. vice-presidential confrontation. One thing’s for sure – it’s not a choice viewers south of the border are agonizing over.

I, as a viewer north of the border, am no longer agonizing over it either: I’ve decided to watch the American thing. And not because I happen to hold dual citizenship – no, I just find it more interesting. I’ll probably watch the Canadian one, recorded, tomorrow. For now, though, I’ll be tuning in (or clicking in, or whatever – I’ll be watching online) to Sarah Palin, debater extraordinaire – or at least we hope.

Schoolwork

In Miscellaneous on Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 7:12 pm

I, as a homeschooled high school sophomore, thought you might be interested in what courses I am currently taking. So here goes.

Math
Math is a bore, an utter bore, a complete bore, a total bore; even worse, I’m good at it: I have no excuse for finding it so boring. Perhaps my two years at school ingrained a ridiculous hatred of math in me; or perhaps I’m just stubborn. Both, probably.

Physics
Given my dislike of math, you’d probably think I’d dislike physics as well. No such luck: I love physics. In fact, I recently decided that I wanted to be an electrical engineer because I looked ahead in my Physics text and saw that we would be studying electrical circuits. Keep in mind, though, that I change my career goals about once a week.

British History
Not the worst history course I ever took. One good thing about it is that the grade is entirely based on your essays, rather than tests: I’m great at the former, and I regularly fail the latter.

English Literature
Probably my favorite course. I have to study three novels (Out of the Silent Planet, Rasselas, and Wuthering Heights) and three Shakespearean plays (Julius Ceasar, Macbeth, and Much Ado about Nothing.) I could choose to study either Shakespeare or Canadian Literature, and I chose Shakespeare, because my Dad said, “For Better or For Worse is about the best Canadian literature there is.”

French
Not much to say here. This is a pretty standard Grade 10 French course.

Book Review: The Elements of Style

In Miscellaneous on Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 6:51 am

The Elements of Style

by William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White

These days, it is becoming increasingly difficult to find people who write well. Similarly, it is difficult to find resources instructing such people in the right way to write. More than half a century after it was first published, Strunk and White’s classic is still an excellent resource for writers and non-writers alike.

The Elements of Style is simply written, but covers a wide variety of topics: punctuation is covered in detail, as well as trifling matters such as line spacing, margins, and titles. Strunk provides many comparisons between correct and incorrect English; and not only these comparisons but also his prose is often amusing. A set of basic rules is the meat of the book, but there is also a list of words and phrases to be avoided, and White has added an “Approach to Style” that will be helpful to both novelists and business writers.

Perhaps one of the most useful, and definitely one of the most Strunkian, of the rules is Rule 17: Omit Needless Words. Strunk begins it with a paragraph the likes of which are seldom seen in modern writing; “sixty-three words that could change the world,” White says in his introduction.

“Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subject only in outline, but that every word tell.”

Strunk himself, as White’s English professor at Cornell University, thought that this rule was the most important one of all, and followed it perfectly, omitting every needless word he came across. White says in the introduction, “In the days when I was sitting in his class, he omitted so many needless words, and omitted them so forcibly and with such eagerness and obvious relish, that he often seemed in the position of having shortchanged himself – a man left with nothing more to say yet time to fill, a radio prophet who had outdistanced the clock. Will Strunk got out of this predicament by a simple trick: he uttered every sentence three times. When he delivered his oration on brevity to the class, he leaned forward over his desk, grasped his coat lapels in his hands, and, in a husky, conspiratorial voice, said, ‘Rule Seventeen. Omit needless words! Omit needless words! Omit needless words!’”

And omit them he did when he authored his manuscript: although a short book, The Elements of Style is a good book, and shouldn’t be shunned simply because of its age or length. Concise, witty, and to the point, it says far more in its eighty pages than its modern competitors say in their hundreds. This paperback volume proudly bears on its cover a retail prices of five dollars and ninety-five cents – a bargain, considering the value it has to anybody. Whether or not you already think you write well, you can certainly learn from this book.